Order the summer edition here

Limitation on freedom

What should we answer?
We know it so well, and we really don't want to. Therefore, we are at odds with our own feelings when we act as blind to the destruction of nature.

With climate and biodiversity as enormous threats to our existence, more and more people can realize that culture must undergo a major transformation. But where is the avant-garde that can unravel the societal and planetary complexity so that it is understood by all of us while instilling hope that another world is possible? Who can carry the revolutionary torch from past experiences of victory and defeat, and show us the way forward? These are questions that the 100 year after the Russian Revolution may be appropriate to ask.

In their new book What should we answer? sociologist Rasmus Willig and philosopher Arne Johan Vetlesen list nine examples of how modern man has fallen into a trap and been captured in consciousness. The authors formulate a new concept of freedom to be formulated under the heading «restriction», on the grounds: «otherwise there is no freedom». According to the authors, it is necessary for man to liberate himself from the nine different ways of being captured, so that we can again "get wings" and "regain [our] freedom and thus increase [our] chances of survival".

The trapped man. According to the authors, we live in an illusion and in the hope of a technological fix that can save us from the social order and lifestyle that we know well. . .

Dear reader.
To continue reading, create a new free reader account with your email,
or logg inn if you have done it before. (click on forgotten password if you have not received it by email already).
Select if necessary Subscription (69kr)

- advertisement -
avatar photos
Niels Johan Juhl-Nielsen
Juhl-Nielsen resides in Copenhagen.

You may also likeRelated
Recommended