Subscription 790/year or 190/quarter

What is accelerationism?

Ørjan Steiro Mortensen
Ørjan Steiro Mortensen
Norwegian Ph.D. student in philosophy at the University of Jyväskylä, Finland. I have a master's degree from the University of Oslo. Research interests are Kantian transcendentalism, Heideggerian fundamental ontology, philosophy of technology, German idealism, speculative realism.
Acceleration (anthology, excerpt)
Forfatter: Armen Avanessian
Forlag: Existenz (2021)
BOOK EXCERPT / No serious policy in our time can remain defensive if it is to win. The reader is encouraged to see the possibilities for a liberated and solidary future in the extension of the capitalist-driven development.


Philosophical accelerationism is a tendency that first crystallized as a separate intellectual direction in Britain in the mid-1990s. Around the culturally critical collective CCRU (Cybernetic Culture Research Unit) at the University of Warwick in England, a radical and interdisciplinary environment formed that combined avant-garde French theory, science fiction-inspired pop culture, sociology, politics and technology studies in its search for a future ideological project. could correspond to what they perceived as the contemporary need for a new intellectual paradigm.

CCRU was officially established by the cyberfeminist Sadie Plant, who between 1995 and 1997 was employed at the Institute of Philosophy in Warwick. CCRU was a loosely composed group that consisted of both students and staff at the university. Thinkers such as Nick Land, Stephen Metcalf, Mark Fisher, Iain Hamilton Grant, Reza Negarestani, Robin Mackay, Ray Brassier and Kodwo Eshun were at various times associated with the CCRU. In the time after Sadie Plant left the University of Warwick, Nick Land took over as the leader of the collective, and in its active period until 2003, CCRU's work became increasingly experimental and transcendent in relation to the academic standard. CCRU eventually moved its activities to a private apartment and published mainly its works as self-produced fanzines.

Robot and computer technology fascinated

CCRU's accelerationism addressed the growing potential of modern societies for renewal and development and looked ahead. Inspired by the science-fiction literature's speculative foreshadowing of the technological and social possibilities of the future, the political and social realities of today sought to see the germs of the new reality that was manifesting itself at the expense of the old. Robotics and computer technology in particular fascinated the accelerationists deeply, and in CCRU's work a normative imperative emerged to build on everything that could accelerate the development of these technologies, and at the same time attack the contemporary trends that were seen as obstacles to development.

The environment around CCRU mentally prepared for the coming of the new high-tech world through experimenting with new forms of industrial art, music and film and through mind-shifting drugs and rave culture. Based on a reinterpretation of Gilles Deleuze's desire-oriented concept of subject, one sought beyond the self-understanding of classical ideologies in order to identify with the violent revolutionary forces of modernity itself. Deleuze's concept of "libidinous materialism" identified the subjectivity of the drive of desire and explained the essence of the subject as an inner driving force that directed itself at objects of desire outside itself. The transcendent tendency of the subject of desire was linked to the tendency of societies to transcend "territorialized" (stiffened) traditional social structures in modernity, and global capitalism was identified as the metasubjective, collective driving force behind the liberation of growing transforming forces worldwide.

Because capitalism fundamentally reflected the essential characteristics of the object of desire, it was concluded that desire-driven capitalism had to be given free rein so that development could accelerate and leave behind the historically conditioned social structures that stood in the way of maximum development of the collective drive of desire.

The environment around CCRU mentally prepared for the coming of the new high-tech world through experimenting with new forms of industrial art, music and film and through awareness-shifting drugs and rave culture.

One did not just go in to prepare oneself and the culture for the inevitable alienation that was already in the cards, as market interests had recently established a world domination after the fall of the Iron Curtain; one should play along with this alienation, lose oneself in it, and try by all means to help dissolve the structures and norms of the established societies in order to actively meet the cybernetic future. Accelerationism as an ideological project in the sense of the CCRU was therefore opposed to any conservatism, any humanism, collectivist social movements such as traditional socialism and social democracy, environmental movement, nationalism, populism (democracy in general), in short any social project that wanted to protect existing humanist values ​​in meeting with modernization. CCRU's accelerationism therefore came into conflict with what we should call the accelerationist tendencies on the left, where the criteria for judging societal development were dictated by concepts of social justice and human welfare.

Ill. Fabio Magnasciutti, See Www.Libex.Eu
Ill. Fabio Magnasciutti, See Www.Libex.Eu

Left-wing accelerationism

In our late modern historical period, we in the West are faced with a serious political problem. This problem is well summed up in Margaret Thatcher's neoliberal statement that "There Is No Alternative", in the undisputed status of market liberalism as a political system and in the title of Francis Fukuyama's infamous 1989 book The End of History and the Last Man (The End of History and The Last Man).

Because it is an established truth that capitalism is the driving force behind renewal, and because the great modern socialist experiments were either discredited by their own collapse, or today by the authoritarian horror scenario that has become China's capitalism with Communist Party values, the progressive left has lost all legitimacy. Or better: the left's project is no longer progressive. The few symbolic "watchdogs" from the far left in the Western parliaments today have the task of uncovering and mobilizing against the most inhuman consequences of the constant march of capital interests forward. The left-wing class warriors have become reactionary and defensive.

It was concluded that lust-driven capitalism had to be given free rein.

Unlike the classical Marxist tradition, which looked to the future and the revolution as the necessary course of events that pointed to the abolition of the internal contradictions of the capitalist social system, today's red front has enough to fight to defend what still exists of welfare. , working life regulation and democratic management of resources. The dynamic ability of capitalism to continually develop new forms of value creation in the form of new business models and new technologies that seek to circumvent the aforementioned "human security system" is today the most transformative force the globe has ever seen.

The current geological epoch is referred to as the "anthropocene", as the epoch in which man is the physical force that has the greatest impact on what the earth as a whole actually looks like. Critics of this concept prefer to call the era "capitalocene", as it is impossible to understand how human ravages on the planet take place without understanding capitalism as a systematic condition of possibility.

# Accelerate! Manifesto for an accelerationist policy

Accelerationist tendencies therefore meant something different for the early revolutionary left than what we put into the term today. What can be called accelerationist features of classical, high-modern Marxism is the understanding that history was on its way to a new stage, because the conditions produced by capitalism by its own logic were so untenable that the people would eventually have to revolt to save themselves. self. For them, any progress for capitalism was at the same time a step towards its own finality. It just had to be bad enough before it could really get good. The more brutal the class antagonisms came to light, the more capitalism showed its true face, the easier it would be to recruit activists and radicalize the masses.

The Left Party's project is no longer progressive.

But if capitalist history has no end in sight, what about the political left? Yes, it takes the form of a defensive bulwark for human dignity and the preservation of what still makes human life worth living. It tunes in a moralistic and sentimental tone and reminds us of the old solidarity ideals that haunt us as insubstantial ghosts, while we compete with each other for the privilege of being exploited in the internationalized labor market. But in this way of having to go against the flow and try to hold back the general trend of development worldwide, is an ungrateful position to be in. It is not sexy to be a party brake, and maybe it is not at all possible to win in the long run.

This situation has inspired the authors of the New Accelerationist Manifesto Accelerate! Manifesto for an accelerationist policy from 2013, Nick Srnicek and Alex Williams, who claims that no serious policy in our time can remain defensive if it is to win, and encourages the reader to once again see the possibilities for a liberated and solidary future in continuation of the capitalist-driven development. If we fail to invent new ways of imagining the future, the result will simply be that we will have no future, and the cataclysmic effects of the destruction of natural resources, as well as the possibility of new high-tech wars, will lead to the common doom of civilizations. .

The first of these challenges is to remove the progressive mask of capitalism.

The progressive mask of capitalism

The manifesto diagnoses that the imagination is paralyzed. In a new alliance between Enlightenment thinking and science fiction, we who think about politics must give ourselves the task of inventing a possible future that corresponds to the challenges that our time presents us with. The first of these challenges is to remove the progressive mask of capitalism: capitalism must be uncovered as a parasite on development that perverts the ability to prioritize and leads to enormous waste of resources.

The Manifesto claims that in today's capitalist system we can not even sense the potential inherent in the technology that has already been developed. We must win back the argument that capitalism is not only unjust and destructive, but that capitalism is actually holding back development. Societies could have been organized more rationally, new useful technology could have been distributed and implemented freely and fairly in a world without private property rights. The physical and mental conditions people live under in a competitive everyday life are not the best for creative thinking and innovative expression. We must maintain that the goal of a post-capitalist democratic society is collective self-control, not economic growth. The accelerationist left thus argues that capitalism in our stage of history prevents us from becoming even more modern.

The left must therefore become a platform that constitutes a complex organizational ecology, where a diversity of organizational forms complement each other and together can meet the social, technical, economic and psychological demands of the struggle against capitalism. This organizational ecology must itself constitute a microcosm and a model for the new society. The Left must show in practice that progress has better conditions for growth outside capitalism, and it must be able to acquire any technological and scientific progress developed under capitalism, in order to show that these can be realized more effectively in a non-capitalist context. The accelerationist left must therefore be able to analyze social networks, actor-based modeling, analysis of big data, and advanced economic models, so that the effective tools developed by modern science and technology do not remain in the hands of the capital interests that today holds the hegemony. Only in this way can the sword of capitalism be turned against capitalism itself, and a high-tech alternative to capitalism can emerge as a speculative cognitive mapping for the future.

After the optimism of high modernity?

Self-undermining doomsday prophecy unfortunately seems like a project that has greater resonance in our imaginatively paralyzed times than the more optimistic idea of ​​hyperstition, which Armen Avanessian takes over from the 90s accelerationists in the CCRU. The idea of ​​"hyperstition" (juxtaposition of the terms hype and superstition) argues that renewal must take place in the delight of speculation, that the future must flow out of the belief in the possibilities of the future through a forward-looking anticipation of the present. The fact that in today's desperate intellectual climate one longs for the new "hype" which speculatively anticipates a new possible future, does not mean that we are thus able to predict the real consequences of the new projects we are implementing. In our precarious situation, it is perhaps better to therefore indulge in a via negative and focus on avoiding the worst disasters that are already identifiable and imminent. A bit like a rehabilitating drug addict, we need to focus on what specific therapeutic strategies we can implement here and now, so that we do not end up reproducing the vicious circles we are caught in today. Can one go so far as to call the accelerationist the craving for the next "hype" for a kind of spiritual abstinence syndrome that lingers on the optimism of high modernity? We have to find a new way of being as a human being, both technologically and politically. But because the question of this new way of being is an increasingly acute "to be or not to be", we who live late in modernity must exercise enormous caution when we dare to fantasize about the future.

Printed with permission from the publisher Existenz, an excerpt from the afterword to the anthology Acceleration (2021). The book is edited by Armen Avanessian, and translated into Norwegian by Anders Dunker.

- self-advertisement -

Recent Comments:

Siste artikler

The human planet

ESSAY: What actually lies in the term 'anthropocene' as the term for the era we now find ourselves in? The Anthropocene refers to the many ways in which we humans have transformed the world and recreated it in our image. But there has been a discussion between biologists, anthropologists, geologists and other disciplines about what the term actually entails.

Desire, according to Lacan, is impossible to grasp

PSYCHOLOGY: Blaise Pascal was a contradictory figure: He was one of the most important mathematicians and scientists of all time, but at the same time a rather strict and dogmatic Catholic. By dogmatic is mainly meant that he emphasized a clear distinction between faith and knowledge. And ask yourself: Is there a difference between 'idiocy's truth' and 'truth's idiocy'?

The NATO resistance, a sprout for SF and Orientering

LABOR PARTY: The leading force in the labor movement manipulated Norway into a military, political and economic marriage with the Western capitalist bloc NATO. What methods did the leadership of the Labor Party use to gain a majority, and how was the first opposition organized? Sigurd Evensmo was culture editor at Arbeiderbladet when the first NATO advances were reported. When the party enrolled Norway in the alliance in 1949, he left the editor's chair and resigned from the Labor Party.

The private is political

activism: One of the main goals of the Iranian clergy, the politicians and the people who support the clergy is to keep women and everything related to them out of the public sphere. But Nobel Prize nominee Masih Alinejad is giving voice to Iran's oppressed women through social and global media. Honesty, without pretensions, is an important part of Alinejad's life and writing.

Progress in dark times

FUTURE: With crises on all sides, it has become difficult to claim that the world is moving forward progressively. In her new book Fortschritt und Regression, Rahel Jaeggi will nevertheless stick to the idea of ​​progress. Society does not aim at inherent goals – they primarily solve problems, she claims.

A renewal of the critique of ideology

ALIENATION: This little book by Rahel Jaeggi is stimulating and useful – at a time when ideology criticism and the hermeneutics of suspicion have come under pressure, among other things from people who cultivate 'presence' and the everyday. And what if our actions and institutions are emptied of meaning and go on autopilot – will we be perceived as alienated?

Once upon a time

GAZA: Snapshots from a Gaza that is gone forever. Once upon a time, everyone passed through Gaza. And to all it was the "Athens of Asia," because it was a center of philosophy. Gaza was conquered, and was Ottoman from 1516, British from 1917, Egyptian from 1948 – and finally Israeli from 1967. In the old Gaza you saw girls in miniskirts, girls with whiskey and cigarettes, girls dancing, and girls painting at the art academy . And the Ottoman teahouse Beit Sitti was a haunt for intellectuals, musicians and artists. There was also a rock band and a yoga centre, and pizzeria Italiano and granita... But today?

The biopolitical foundations of modern society

PHILOSOPHY: An immune body is understood as protected against outside invaders. But as Esposito has touched on, biological immunity has also had political and military historical significance.

I was completely out of the world

Essay: The author Hanne Ramsdal tells here what it means to be put out of action – and come back again. A concussion leads, among other things, to the brain not being able to dampen impressions and emotions.

Silently disciplining research

PRIORITIES: Many who question the legitimacy of the US wars seem to be pressured by research and media institutions. An example here is the Institute for Peace Research (PRIO), which has had researchers who have historically been critical of any war of aggression – who have hardly belonged to the close friends of nuclear weapons.

Is Spain a terrorist state?

SPAIN: The country receives sharp international criticism for the police and the Civil Guard's extensive use of torture, which is never prosecuted. Regime rebels are imprisoned for trifles. European accusations and objections are ignored.

Is there any reason to rejoice over the coronary vaccine?

COVID-19: There is no real skepticism from the public sector about the coronary vaccine – vaccination is recommended, and the people are positive about the vaccine. But is the embrace of the vaccine based on an informed decision or a blind hope for a normal everyday life?

The military commanders wanted to annihilate the Soviet Union and China, but Kennedy stood in the way

Military: We focus on American Strategic Military Thinking (SAC) from 1950 to the present. Will the economic war be supplemented by a biological war?


Bjørnboe: In this essay, Jens Bjørneboe's eldest daughter reflects on a lesser – known psychological side of her father.

Arrested and put on smooth cell for Y block

Y-Block: Five protesters were led away yesterday, including Ellen de Vibe, former director of the Oslo Planning and Building Agency. At the same time, the Y interior ended up in containers.

A forgiven, refined and anointed basket boy

Pliers: The financial industry takes control of the Norwegian public.

Michael Moore's new film: Critical to alternative energy

EnvironmentFor many, green energy solutions are just a new way to make money, says director Jeff Gibbs.

The pandemic will create a new world order

Mike Davis: According to activist and historian Mike Davis, wild reservoirs, like bats, contain up to 400 types of coronavirus that are just waiting to spread to other animals and humans.

The shaman and the Norwegian engineer

cohesion: The expectation of a paradise free of modern progress became the opposite, but most of all, Newtopia is about two very different men who support and help each other when life is at its most brutal.

Skinless exposure

Anorexia: shameless uses Lene Marie Fossen's own tortured body as a canvas for grief, pain and longing in her series of self portraits – relevant both in the documentary self Portrait and in the exhibition Gatekeeper.