Order the summer edition here

How to take responsibility after a war?

Going to war and dropping 588 bombs across a country means that you have a "special responsibility" to help afterwards.

(Note: The article is machine-translated from Norwegian by Gtranslate)

The Norwegian narrative of the Libya war has changed significantly. From an almost unison understanding that the war was right and good in 2011, it has become clearer and clearer in recent years that the war was both unnecessary and disastrously unthinkable. The price is still being paid by the Libyans themselves: From being one of Africa's most prosperous countries, the country now, almost eight years after NATO bombing, is still characterized by chaos, crime and regional divide. If there is a state in North Africa that today deserves the term "failed state", it must be Libya.

Much has been written in the past about how to prevent such wars in the future in the best possible way. For example, some have demanded open-ended treatment if Norway is to participate in war. Others, including the Petersen Committee, which this fall released its report on the war, have proposed to set up groups in the civil service that will be tasked with promoting countermeasures and "checklists" to politicians along the way.

All these are good suggestions, we should carry on with them. But what will be the response of the peace movement when the war is underway, or even more so – when the war is formally ended? After all, it is easier to be against a war than to give constructive answers to what to do when one loses just that fight.

The first priority must be to put in place effective humanitarian aid and support for reconstruction assistance. This requirement, no matter how obvious it may sound, is in stark contrast to what Norway actually did. In February 2017, Prime Minister Erna Solberg stated that Norway had no «special responsibility for finding solutions and contributing to stabilization work afterwards». Here, the peace movement's response should be consistent and clear: Of course, going to war and dropping 588 bombs over a country means that one has a "special responsibility" to help afterwards!

- advertisement -

A fair rule of thumb might be to estimate the cost of the damage we contributed. This should be possible by organizing investigative commissions made up of representatives from both Norway and the state where the war may have taken place.

For Libya, Norway dropped 588 bombs across the country. By examining where these hit, at least as far as possible, one can also estimate the volume of destruction, and thus the cost. Payments should then be coordinated through UN agencies so that they are not exploited for purely political purposes.

Norway's responsibility for today's situation in Libya must be debatable. Of course, it is not Norway's fault alone that it has become the way it has become. But we are not irresponsible. No one forced us to release the bombs we dropped – 15 percent of the total. Decisions to go to war are the most serious decisions a politician can make. The main task of the peace movement should always be to do what it can to prevent war from becoming politicians' answers. But if we fail in that task, the requirement should be that the responsibility subsequently follows the degree of seriousness. Perhaps we will then release more disasters of the Libya type.

ivar@norgesfredsrad.no
Vangen works in the Norwegian Peace Council.

Give an answer

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn about how your comment data is processed.

Artist / TEXT! Art and such 1981-2020 (by Guttorm Nordø)Guttorm Nordø talks about the immediate as the only guideline for his art. One of the finest, most risk-taking and wittiest art books of 2021?
Essay / This is how Gunda sees the worldIn what way can the human narrative of oneself be challenged by, for one hour and thirty-three minutes, looking at the world through the gaze of a pig?
Middle East / It is not about peace, but about smart businessWhile other countries were preoccupied with covid-19, Arabs and Israelis could, without outside interference, concentrate on peace. And business.
Climate / The New Climate War (by Michael E. Mann)Are vegans' attempts to lift the meat comb or drop flying the solution to the climate problem? Over the past year, our changing travel and behavior patterns have had only a small effect on global greenhouse gas emissions.
Corona / The more positive aspects of CoronaNothing is in a hurry anymore. Illness, death, and economic ruin are the hallmarks of the pandemic, but in corona-the time also arises cognition and insight, which we should take with us further.
Conversations with the speeds of light. The construction of the digital realm of the dead. (by Ole Sverre Olsen)When Klaus Schwab, founder of the World Economic Forum, introduces the Fourth Industrial Revolution (Shaping the Future of the Fourth Industrial Revolution), and when Elon Musk, the founder of the successful Tesla, plus Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg presents the visions for the 21st century , you should pay close attention to what is the specific content of what they present of technology, researched in the laboratories of Silicon Valley.
Short film / Stolen Fish,… (by Gosia Juszczak,…)With very different angles, two of the documentaries at the Short Film Festival show how depressingly far away we are a sustainable development.
Modernism / Carsten Boysen: A fair housing policy,… (by Jon Guttu,…)Can the current anti-social urban and housing situation need more modernism? Two books actualize a belief in progress that society can change for the better.
Cities / Ordinary diplomacy serves the state, urban diplomacy the peopleAmerica's new leaders have noted China's use of cities in its diplomacy. Is urban policy emerging as the new foreign policy?
Environment / The world of cities,… (by Ellen S de Vibe,…)We are on a collision course with both natural and social capital, globally, what former UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon called a global suicide pact. Well, we have to build a new future stone by stone – knowing that we will not see the result ourselves.
Climate / The globe is burning. What must be done? (by Heikki Holmås)Heikki Holmås describes zero emission targets in a new book, where the climate crisis is solved with taxes and emission requirements, plenty of green power and technology. But at what price?
- Advertisement -

You may also likeRelated
Recommended