Order the summer edition here

The government did not strengthen whistleblower protection

NOTICE / The government did not follow up on the notification committee's proposal, neither about its own notification ombudsman nor its own notification committee.




(THIS ARTICLE IS MACHINE TRANSLATED by Google from Norwegian)

In November 2016, the Norwegian government appointed a committee to review the notification rules in the Working Environment Act and assess the need for legislative amendments or other measures to strengthen whistleblower protection. The committee submitted its recommendation on 15 March 2018. Great expectations were attached to this opportunity to strengthen the whistleblowing institution in Norway. It was particularly interesting that the notification committee concluded that notification is a value and not a problem for society when the notification is taken seriously and followed up, and wrote: "The goal must therefore be to establish good systems and cultures for notification in the companies."

Own alert agent

The committee proposed that a separate whistleblowing ombudsman be established to provide advice, support and assistance to whistleblowers in specific cases. The ombud should have good competence and assist both whistleblowers, whistleblowers, employers and others affected.

At the same time, it was believed that the notification ombud should convey general knowledge and thus an understanding of the value of notification to society. In serious whistleblowing cases of great social significance, the committee believed that the whistleblowing ombud should have special competence and the opportunity to take the initiative for independent investigations.

It should be mentioned that the opposition in the Storting had supported both the whistleblowing ombudsman and his own committee.

The majority of the committee proposed that a separate tribunal be established for whistleblowing cases, which should assess and decide whether, after notification, retaliation had taken place against the whistleblower. The tribunal should have the competence to award compensation and redress to the whistleblower. The committee also believed that the employer should to a greater extent be imposed with an activity obligation to investigate the notice. The tribunal was also to have the authority to investigate whether there was a breach of the employer's duty of activity for following up the notice.

The committee also wanted a clearer clarification of the employer's responsibility for care when it came to measures that could prevent retaliation. As of today, it is the individual whistleblower who considers himself exposed to retaliation, who must bring his case before the court for assessment of whether there is retaliation after whistleblowing.

This is very expensive and something most people can not afford. The notification board was intended to be a low-threshold offer so that cases of retaliation could be resolved without court proceedings, and the notification committee proposed that access to redress and compensation should be expanded and the levels of compensation raised.

The committee proposed a separate whistleblowing law which was to include the establishment of the whistleblowing ombud and the whistleblowing board. Through this law, the mandate and authority of these bodies were to be regulated. Notification in working conditions was still to be regulated in the Working Environment Act and not in the Notification Act.

Measures require resources

The committee emphasized that the measures proposed to strengthen whistleblower protection in Norwegian working life would require resources. It is worth quoting the whistleblowing committee on this point: “It is important to emphasize that if society wants to achieve the goal in the committee's mandate to strengthen the protection of whistleblowers, then it has its price. The question will ultimately be to what extent society is willing to invest in and invest in strengthened efforts to facilitate more warnings of matters worthy of criticism and provide good whistleblower protection, which overall will provide socio-economically profitable uncovering of matters worthy of criticism in Norwegian companies and ensure a better working life. "

The sample was largely ignored

The notification committee's recommendation was sent for broad consultation, and in the spring of 2019, the Government put forward in Prop. L 74 (2018–2019) the proposal for amendments to the Working Environment Act. The Government's response can illustrate:
• The government did not follow up on the proposals from the notification committee at system level, neither about the notification representative nor its own notification committee.
• The government did not want to establish a separate committee for this purpose, but would rather assign this task to the existing committee, and agreed that this issue should be investigated further. A current issue is to add this to the Equality and Discrimination Tribunal.

  • For the most part, the government chose only to continue the current regulation of notification of objectionable or illegal matters. Some minor clarifications of the legal text were, however, later adopted, such as elaboration of what is considered to be matters worthy of criticism, and the employer's duty of activity regarding the investigation of the notice.
  • However, the Notification Committee's proposal to introduce strict liability for financial loss as it has been for redress compensation was granted.

It should be mentioned that the opposition in the Storting had supported both the whistleblowing ombudsman and his own committee. Therefore, it must be stated that the notification committee's very constructive and well-thought-out proposal was to a small extent followed up by the government.

It is a long way to go before it is safe to report matters worthy of criticism of a socially harmful nature in today's Norway. The new provisions do not ensure that all parties to the process are taken care of, and this applies to notifications, notifications and employers. The new legal provisions lack boldness and reveal that the government does not recognize that notification is a new element in our social and legal order.

ALSO READ: Those with power and authority have always wanted to cut off the wings of whistleblowers

- self-advertisement -

Recent Comments:

Siste artikler

Totalitarianism then and now

iDEOLOGY: By agreeing on a suitable 'enemy', a disintegrated society finds coherence, energy and meaning. A totalitarian propaganda has led to the conclusion that Ukraine will now be allowed to use F-16 jets against the nuclear power Russia – with the major consequences this may entail.

Capitalism's reality and beyond

NEOLIBERALISM: Capitalist realism is a term for the late capitalist world, where it is not possible to imagine a different and better world – it is what it is. Did neoliberal capital take the form of a wall-to-wall ideology and constitute an affective regime? And was the 'end of history' nothing more than a class project?

less is more

PHOTO ART: Over the course of thirty years, large museums have gone from being underfunded, sleepy places to audience magnets and economically important tourist attractions. We find a counterweight in small museums – such as those mentioned in this essay from Greece. What you choose to present to others matters less than where you choose to do it.

The fear of the end of the world

FUTURE: For the first time in its long history, humanity is – possibly inevitably – facing an increasing and real risk of extinction due to the reckless activities of Homo sapiens. The effects of greed, violence, ignorance, fanaticism, political short-sightedness, overpopulation and over-exploitation of all available resources are the prerequisites for an expected disaster.

Society on the brink of a nervous breakdown

PROSPERITY: Is there even a way back to our society as it was before? According to Stephan Lessenich, capitalism and prosperity in the West is a result of the exploitation of colonized peoples. But according to him, to abolish capitalism would be to abolish our democracy at the same time.

Where 97 percent of the population lives on the threshold of starvation

AFGHANISTAN: Zarifa Ghafari is on the BBC's list of the world's 100 most influential women. This Afghan mayor knows very well that she is a symbol – but perhaps most of all an attraction.

New European security architecture

UKRAINE/RUSSIA: The authors of this book believe that the European countries should loosen their ties with the United States in order to achieve constructive results in what can be considered a European security problem. Two parties can only achieve security together with the other party – not at the expense of it.

The caricature and the role of satire in information warfare

VISUALLY: Graphic satire has become a weapon. The first 'caricature war' arose between Protestants and Catholics. Caricature is about – also in Ukraine and Russia – increasing morale in one's own ranks by ridiculing the enemy with all possible means and stereotypes – and praising one's own side.

I was completely out of the world

Essay: The author Hanne Ramsdal tells here what it means to be put out of action – and come back again. A concussion leads, among other things, to the brain not being able to dampen impressions and emotions.

Silently disciplining research

PRIORITIES: Many who question the legitimacy of the US wars seem to be pressured by research and media institutions. An example here is the Institute for Peace Research (PRIO), which has had researchers who have historically been critical of any war of aggression – who have hardly belonged to the close friends of nuclear weapons.

Is Spain a terrorist state?

SPAIN: The country receives sharp international criticism for the police and the Civil Guard's extensive use of torture, which is never prosecuted. Regime rebels are imprisoned for trifles. European accusations and objections are ignored.

Is there any reason to rejoice over the coronary vaccine?

COVID-19: There is no real skepticism from the public sector about the coronary vaccine – vaccination is recommended, and the people are positive about the vaccine. But is the embrace of the vaccine based on an informed decision or a blind hope for a normal everyday life?

The military commanders wanted to annihilate the Soviet Union and China, but Kennedy stood in the way

Military: We focus on American Strategic Military Thinking (SAC) from 1950 to the present. Will the economic war be supplemented by a biological war?

homesickness

Bjørnboe: In this essay, Jens Bjørneboe's eldest daughter reflects on a lesser – known psychological side of her father.

Arrested and put on smooth cell for Y block

Y-Block: Five protesters were led away yesterday, including Ellen de Vibe, former director of the Oslo Planning and Building Agency. At the same time, the Y interior ended up in containers.

A forgiven, refined and anointed basket boy

Pliers: The financial industry takes control of the Norwegian public.

Michael Moore's new film: Critical to alternative energy

EnvironmentFor many, green energy solutions are just a new way to make money, says director Jeff Gibbs.

The pandemic will create a new world order

Mike Davis: According to activist and historian Mike Davis, wild reservoirs, like bats, contain up to 400 types of coronavirus that are just waiting to spread to other animals and humans.

The shaman and the Norwegian engineer

cohesion: The expectation of a paradise free of modern progress became the opposite, but most of all, Newtopia is about two very different men who support and help each other when life is at its most brutal.

Skinless exposure

Anorexia: shameless uses Lene Marie Fossen's own tortured body as a canvas for grief, pain and longing in her series of self portraits – relevant both in the documentary self Portrait and in the exhibition Gatekeeper.