Order the autumn edition here

Silently disciplining research

PRIO: Researchers who question the legitimacy of US wars, seem to experience being ousted from their positions in research and media institutions. The example presented here is from the Institute for Peace Research in Oslo (PRIO), an institution which historically has had researchers critical of wars of aggression – and who can hardly be labeled friends of nuclear arms.

The researcher is said to seek objectivity and truth. But the researcher learns to adapt his issues and conclusions to what the authorities and management expect, and this despite the fact that academic freedom is enshrined in Norway with "freedom to express oneself publicly", "freedom to promote new ideas" and "freedom to to choose method and material ». In today's societal debate, freedom of speech seems to revolve around the right to insult someone with another ethnicity or religion. But freedom of speech should be about the right to scrutinize power and society. My experience is that the opportunity to say something that a researcher has become more restricted. . .

Dear reader. Create / open your free reader account with your email above to read on.
(Do you have Subscription, sign in here.)

Ola Tunander
Tunander is Professor Emeritus of PRIO. See also wikipedia, hos PRIO: , as well as a bibliography on Waterstone

Related articles