When the Norwegian Radiation Protection Authority LD criticized for inadequate management of the area of wireless communication, the standard answer is that they follow consensus, WHO and other reputable institutions – and that the radiation is per mille of the recommended limit values. The ongoing the debate in MODERN TIMES is no exception. If you look at the instances and the basis in the seams, you see a reality the radiation protection never comments on.
The ICNIRP Foundation and bodies intertwined with this constitutes the backbone of radiation protection. ICNIRP, which has created the guidelines the radiation protection follows, is criticized for being a closed club that ignores relevant research, and for ties to the telecom industry. Among the many who point this out is the journalist network Investigate Europe and the 255 international radiologists who support EMF Scientist Appeal, including a former radiation protection professor and expert on WHO's cancer panel IARC, Dariusz Leszczynski.
According to the judge, the radiation from an AMS meter could not possibly be damaged.
WHO's cancer panel classifies the radiation as possibly carcinogenic. When the Norwegian Radiation Protection Authority says they "follow the WHO", this means the group EMF Project, which received great maternity care from the industry.
. . .
Dear reader. You have today opened today's two free articles. Come back tomorrow to read more. Or how about drawing Subscription? Then you can read everything (including the magazines). If you are already there, log in to the menu (possibly the mobile menu) at the top.