Order the summer edition here

The age of the investor and the investor

Le temps des investis. Essai sur la nouvelle question social
Forfatter: Michel Feher
Forlag: La découverte (Frankrike)

To be or not to be creditworthy – that is the question in the era of investment capitalism.

(Note: The article is mostly machine-translated from Norwegian by Gtranslate)

The financial crisis in 2008 made visible an unprecedented change in the economy – from industrial capitalism to financial capitalism and from post-war state-controlled modernization to a neoliberal economy. We have since received numerous analyzes of this change and the reasons behind it – both Keynesians who have focused on the unregulated private markets and those who have analyzed the fall in profit rates after 30 years of overproduction in the advanced economies.

Belgian philosopher Michel Feher's latest book Le temps des investis – "The time invested" – is a contribution to the discussion of this historical course. But the book is also an attempt to formulate a political counterpart and to design new strategies by which a left-wing policy can reject the hegemony of financial capital.

investment Capitalism

Part of Feher's book is a historical review of the economic transformation that has been going on since the mid-1970s. The author describes it as "a skewed realization of neoliberalism" – skewed because the economy created by Reagan and Thatcher, among others, differed from the neoliberal theory that Friedman and Hayek developed after World War II. They envisioned a community of contractors, all running their own small business. The early neoliberalists criticized the state-controlled economy, which they feared would lead to socialism.

The neoliberalism of today is often criticized precisely for having created a society where we are all marketed small businesses in competition with each other. But, Feher writes, that's not actually what happened. Such an analysis does not take into account the emergence of investors. The new accumulation regime is not a neoliberal entrepreneurial economy the way the neoliberal ideologues of the 1940s wanted but one investment capitalism.

Creditworthiness

- advertisement -

When the Left criticizes man's neoliberalism, it overlooks what the introduction of credit has meant to the economy of recent decades. We are not become small entrepreneurs trying to make a profit – we are what Feher calls "invested" trying to be creditworthy. This is the condition whether one is an individual, a company or a state. We are all subject to the whims of finance capital – we are all projects that try to make us for investors. Today, it is they who control the economy, neither the employers nor the state.

The nation states have even had to lower the corporate tax rate to attract multinational companies. They have thus eroded their own tax base and thus have been forced to take out debt in order to maintain a certain level of welfare.

We are not small entrepreneurs trying to make a profit – we are "invested" trying to be credit worthy.

The political-economic struggle has thus changed terrain. The most important thing is to pay off its loans in order to borrow new ones from the almighty finance people. That does not mean, Feher points out, that wage workers are not still being paid – they are. But it is necessary to extend Marxism's economics criticism beyond the focus on labor, capital and added value. In postwar industrial capitalism, the point was to buy goods (and labor) as cheaply as possible, and then sell them most expensive. This has now been replaced by a financial capitalism where profits are not made through sales, but where investors try to find credit and the investors try to find investors.

Investor's omnipotence

It is an updated Foucault analysis Feher offers. He draws on the Frenchman's neoliberal analyzes, and also uses Foucault's notion of power and resistance: Financial capital is a new form of government that produces new subjectivities – the invested ones – that are subject to the changing assessments of credit rates. Investors thus have a different power than the employer. The latter acquired the added value the worker produced – the investor decides what to produce at all.

Feher describes the emergence of new forms of resistance. These use the financial capital against the financial capital by, for example, forcing companies to abandon harmful projects for fear of investors withdrawing their money. "Militant speculation" Feher calls it. Another approach is to collectivize the new digital platform companies. When contract workers demand regular employment, companies go bankrupt – and workers can take over themselves. Feher understands this as a further development of the 1970s experiments in self-management.

Defective analysis

Feher's analysis i Le temps des investis has no revolutionary perspective: Since financial capitalism seems unachievable, the question becomes how to avoid its worst sides. The author's best suggestion for a new left-wing policy is bizarre enough to return to the labor movement and its unions. These not only pointed out the inequality of wages, but also fought in concrete terms for more in wages. As we all know, the focus was quickly only on the last, and only on the local workers. But the left must do the same today, Feher suggests – so use the financial capital against it himself.

This may prevent the worst excesses of financial capitalism, but in a historical situation characterized by fierce counter-revolutionary dynamics, the exclusion of ever-increasing numbers from global labor and a loosening climate crisis, there is probably more to be done than Feher's "militant speculation".

Mikkel Bolt
Professor of political aesthetics at the University of Copenhagen.

Give an answer

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn about how your comment data is processed.

UtØya / JULY 22: In my opinion, the police could have panickedI transported 24 battered, shock-injured young people to safety on the mainland from Utøya. Several times I led the boat out to this hell on earth. Where were the police?
July 22nd / Generation Utøya (by Aslaug Holm,…)Utøya as a hotbed for budding party affiliation: This generation still cannot be gagged.
July 22nd / The legacy of July 22 (by Tommy Gulliksen)Tommy Gulliksen's second documentary about July 22 shows a vulnerability that is both reflective, wondering and sincerely honest.
Chronicle / The Norwegian Radiation Protection Authority's "recognized" institutionsDo the authorities overlook research in the field of radiation protection? For example, damage from the pulsation of the AMS meters – or damage from weak electromagnetic fields, such as mobile phone radiation?
China / François Jullien's Unexeptional Thought (by Arne de Boever)Via the sinologist François Jullien, Arne de Boever reveals blind spots, dangerous prejudices and decisive differences in mentality in the meeting between East and West.
Handke / My day in another country (by Peter Handke)An eternal relationship of tension between the individual and the community. With age, has Peter Handke gradually given up on rage?
NATO / At NATO's disposal During the NATO exercise Good Heart, the "enemy" were striking workers and named Norwegian organizations.
Freedom / Everyone (by Ferdinand von Schirach)Ferdinand von Schirach will inspire a modernization of the democratic system.
Photobook / To stick together right into the fall of lifeSome photographs in this book are perceived as ruthless, despite the fact that the photography was done among friends.
Oslo Agreement / Oslo (by Bartlett Sher,…)The escalating conflict between Israel and the Palestinians reminds us again that the Oslo agreement in 1993 did not lead to peace. And thus the HBO film Oslo almost feels like naive escapism.
Conversations with the speeds of light. The construction of the digital realm of the dead. (by Ole Sverre Olsen)Zuckerberg presents the visions for the 21st century, you should pay close attention to what is the concrete content of what they present of technology, researched in the laboratories of Silicon Valley.
- Advertisement -

You may also likeRelated
Recommended