Order the autumn edition here

The masses and the people

PSYCHOLOGY: Is it possible to understand why the majority choose a leader or a slave-like existence?

Is the "mass" a potential "mob empire"? Several new books try to get closer to what the ignorant, primitive or furious masses can mean, such as titles such as The Madness of Crowds   (mention here) and others suggest. Is there anything more psychological to learn about the people, the majority or the herd?

Eirik Høyer Leivestad's new book Fear and loathing in democracy (Vagant) runs over the centuries where he draws with thinkers mass idéHistory: Plato concluded in horror that the majority was too receptive to the seduction of the demagogues. Alexis de Tocqueville mentions in 1835 a "quenched thirst for equality […] that makes man prefer equality in slavery to inequality in freedom." Despite the intelligence of the masses, Karl Marx manifested in revolutionary struggle – also according to Leivestad "a stupidity of the masses manifested in conservative reflexes".

And Baruch spinoza marveled at "what could lead the masses to embrace undisguised tyranny," something Leivestad constantly repeats in the book. In XNUMX, Spinoza referred to the "passive affects" of the masses as fear, hatred, anxiety, and vengeance. And Stendhal wrote in XNUMX: "I can not stand the mob, but under the name peopleI'm passionate about fighting for their happiness. "

Today it is probably more "the people" who are used in the media,. . .

Dear reader. Create / open your free reader account with your email above to read on.
(Do you have Subscription, sign in here.)

Truls Liehttp: /www.moderntimes.review/truls-lie
Editor-in-chief in MODERN TIMES. See previous articles by Lie i Le Monde diplomatique (2003–2013) and Morgenbladet (1993-2003) See also part video work by Lie here.

More leaders


The three ecologies

What does the city of Siracusa have in common with the UN and a French philosopher?

Massive change

How about looking back over 30 years, to be able to see and act into the future?

A liberal left?

Several thinkers believe that it is possible for what they call a rather complacent left to carve out a better and freer future through capitalism and technology.

The masses and the people

Is it possible to understand why the majority choose a leader or a slave-like existence?