After an election, there are always many explanations for why it went as it went. Election researchers usually have a good overview of which votes went where, and which matters were important to the voters. What few people are able to measure, however, is the purely communicative elements of politics. Neither am I. Therefore, I intend to advance some statements and discuss them freely and speculatively.
Statement 1: – SV fell victim to its power ambition
The notion that SV should seek real political power and not just be in opposition gradually matured throughout the 1990s. Being in politics without wanting stools is one. . .
To continue reading, create a new free reader account with your email,
or logg inn if you have done it before. (click on forgotten password if you have not received it by email already).
Select if necessary Subscription (69kr)