Subscription 790/year or 190/quarter

Pilger

The Holberg debate: Essential falsehoods and immaterial truths

Why do ordinary journalists react so strongly to media criticism of the kind Assange and Pilger bring to square one? Dagbladet and Bergens Tidende were quick to call the two "conspiratorial".

The factual basis for the slaughter of the Holberg debate

Assange: While Dagbladet's Inger Merete Hobbelstad claimed Julian Assange was allowed to speak "unanswered," Bergens Tidendes's Eirin Eikefjord gave him the psychiatric diagnosis of being paranoid. Did they have a basis for it?

Clinton's stupid revenge

16. In October, the Australian Broadcasting Corporation sent an interview with Hillary Clinton: one of many to promote her vindictive book on why she was not elected President of the United States.