Order the autumn edition here

Left

INTERVENTIONISM: The Liberal Party believes that Norway should reach out to participate in military interventions, and that such operations should only as a general rule require a UN mandate.

The Social Liberal Left alternates between liberal peace theory in its programs (parliamentary election program and principle program). This is reflected in the fact that free trade and freedom of movement across national borders are understood as crucial preconditions for peace. In line with liberal peace theory, the Liberal Party also emphasizes democratic governance as important for preventing war, as do liberal parties such as the FRP and the Conservative Party. The Liberal Party claims in its program of principles that it is only through international cooperation that we can prevent conflict and create peace. The party's parliamentary election program considers freedom, democracy, the rule of law and a social market economy as the safest way to international peace and security. In any case, foreign policy must be linked to all other political fields, where the overriding goal is to promote human rights globally.

The electoral program can not be said to advocate raising the threshold for the use of military force. On the contrary. When it is emphasized that Norway should strive to participate in military NATO and UN operations, that we have an obligation to intervene militarily to prevent human rights violations, and that military interventions should only as a "main rule" require a UN mandate, this paints a picture of a policy of more military interventionism. In contrast to, for example, SV and Rødt, the Liberal Party does not criticize previous Norwegian contributions in such military operations in its programs. For example, there is no self-criticism that the Liberal Party, together with the Conservatives and the Green Party, went to great lengths for Norway to bomb Libya in 2011.

In terms of disarmament policy, nuclear disarmament is most important in the Liberal Party's election program. The party wants to reduce the world's nuclear warheads and contribute to increased security around the associated weapons system. The Liberal Party will give priority to strengthening existing agreements in which the nuclear weapon states are parties. The party nevertheless believes that nuclear weapons should be banned, and that Norway should join the UN ban on nuclear weapons. The Liberal Party also wants NATO to give higher priority to disarmament.

This program calls for strict control over arms exports, but is far weaker in measures to strengthen this control than the party's previous parliamentary election program. The Liberal Party also advocates strengthening the defense-industrial cooperation between the Norwegian and European arms industry.

The Liberal Party also goes to the polls to strengthen the Armed Forces, both to deter Russia and to fulfill Norway's obligations in NATO. According to the program, the party will increase its military presence in the High North and expand the infrastructure for receiving Allied forces. The Liberal Party wants to increase the number of Allied exercises in Norway. In this context, the Liberal Party emphasizes needs and measures for relaxation to a lesser extent than, for example, the Socialist People's Party, the Labor Party, the Christian Democrats and the Socialist People's Party do in their programs. At the same time, an alliance loyalty to NATO is used as a basis. Here, the Liberal Party expresses almost as strong NATO loyalty as the Conservative Party does in its program.

The Liberal Party considers prevention and knowledge to be the most important thing in preventing violence and abuse. The election program therefore focuses on early intervention by strengthening cooperation between homes, the police, schools, kindergartens, child welfare services, health centers and voluntary organizations. The Liberal Party also has a program of principles (last edited in March). International control over the development and use of autonomous weapons is desired here.

Truls Liehttp: /www.moderntimes.review/truls-lie
Editor-in-chief in MODERN TIMES. See previous articles by Lie i Le Monde diplomatique (2003–2013) and Morgenbladet (1993-2003) See also part video work by Lie here.

ASIA: "We are the ones who are far away, while they are in the center"

TECHNOLOGY: According to Kevin Kelly, technology writer, photographer and publicist, the best thing you can do sometimes is slow down technology.

Two girls with clasped hands stare expressionlessly at the ground

AFGHANISTAN: Sangin – during twenty years of war, this area has been the bloodiest battlefield. It is reminiscent of Roman ruins. In 2001, one in three Afghans was starving – now one in two is starving.

Dialogue between sculpture and photography

DISPLAY: Peter Lindbergh's photographs of Alberto Giacometti's small, secret sculptures – put together in an exhibition: Showing intimacy is a challenge. You come as a visitor, an intruder…

The danger of modified nature

ECOLOGY:With technological measures in all directions, researchers are faced with sky-high challenges. One of them is human ignorance linked to indifference.

To modernize an entire continent

PROFESSIONAL LITERATURE: The tendency of Latin American writers to focus on a better future is part of the region's renewed self-awareness – and modernization with free abortion and new constitutions.

The effort in ORIENTERING contributed to a turning point in the Norwegian labor movement

Sigurd Evensmo <7b> Journalist in the Arbeiderpressen from 1930 to 1949 in recent years as cultural editor of Arbeiderbladet.

A gigantic loss project

THE DISCLOSURES: For 20 years, US authorities lied about the war in Afghanistan.

Hitler's favorite director Leni Riefenstahl

FALSE OF HISTORY? Nina Gladitz challenges the notion that Leni Riefenstahl was an ingenious artist with poor political views. Her documentary about the filmmaker has been hidden in the German WDR archive since 1982. The reactions to Gladitz's book also show how difficult it is to seek truth and give the weakest in society a voice.

Challenging climate sobriety

ECOLOGY: We need such voices as Holly Jean Buck, who criticizes wishful thinking – precisely to help bring forward a hopeful, serious and long-lasting climate fight, beyond all easy optimism.

The comprehensive self-insulation

COVID19: SARS in 2003, bird flu in 2005, MERS in 2012, Ebola in 2014, combined with the financial crisis, massive refugee flows, and revolutions in the Middle East and Greta Thunberg's shrill doomsday voice, had largely immunized the population against something as abstract as Covid19.

We call it precariat

WORK: Precarious working life is perhaps alluring with its freedom and flexibility. But with the precarious also comes the uncontrollable, the unpredictability and the lack of rights. Precarious work has become widespread in a subject such as journalism. Nevertheless, I am still tempted by the flexible tasks, by the sense of variability, freedom almost.

An ever-creeping feeling of loneliness

INSULATION: Acute loneliness affects both winners and losers. Daniel Schreiber visits a wealth of hermit literature – such as Thoreau's Walden and Defoe's Robinson Crusoe. But what does social withdrawal mean today – whether it is the occupational or pandemic condition?
- Advertisement -spot_img

You may also likeRelated
Recommended